People Merci Charlotte 15 August 2024 Chère Charlotte, A year without you has flown by so quickly, though it wasn't easy at first. Each day then felt like a year, but what of it now. I dare to assume that no one has it easy in such situations, and you didn't either, having gone through it before me. After all, it is one of the most painful experiences in a person's life, just like the death of loved ones, although comparing them now seems inappropriate. However, I have experienced both the death of dear ones and their voluntary withdrawal from my life, and thus I feel entitled to speak on this matter. I promised not to write letters to you anymore, although I broke that promise once, maybe twice. Am I breaking it now? I don't know, since I won't be sending this letter to you. It will simply wait for you here, and perhaps in a moment of sorrow, you might remember me when you find yourself here, reading the lines of this letter, which I would never dare to send to you. What right do I have now? And I bear some guilt for what happened, or rather, how it happened. In hindsight, I realize that in our farewell, I behaved poorly in some respects, but please forgive him, he was hurt. And forgive me, who still tries to take responsibility for his actions. I now live in a world without you. In a year, I have grown accustomed to this world and, more importantly, accepted it as a new reality. You are now just part of my past, a bright memory. You are not in this world anymore. In a sense, you have died for me. Died because René and Charlotte have been obliterated by the present; they are now represented by an essence. And maybe it's for the best. I will remember this as one of the most memorable and vivid periods of my life. And, damn it, I sincerely regret that I didn't accept the end of this era with dignity, succumbing to my emotions. I am human. I sincerely regret it, but I no longer blame myself. On behalf of my past self, however, I apologize because my present self fully bears responsibility for my past self. I don't know why you're reading these lines now. Perhaps many people will read them, but not you. That is possible. However, if you are reading, surely you are having a hard time now as well. Life is arranged in such a way that anything can happen at any time. All of it can be endured. I have endured a lot and will endure more, so perhaps my words and my experience can ease your fate a little. Lately, I have thought a lot about the nature of human suffering and now find it fundamental, without which human existence as a species would not be possible. We are simply not designed to be constantly happy. Evolution is almost indifferent to happiness. We cannot live without ever suffering. It is part of our nature. The picture is bleak, and it becomes even darker considering that few people allow themselves such reflections, because these thoughts are terrifying. They can cause considerable pain on their own. However, by indulging in them, I finally understood how to live. Not why, I draw your specific attention to that, because it is easy to answer the question "why": human life has no inherent attribute like meaning; it is not endowed with it from birth. Kurt Vonnegut seemed to best describe humans in his books, portraying them as walking chemical flasks in which various reactions occur from time to time. That's all of us. But there is no meaning in it. That is the price we had to pay for freedom. There is no meaning. And there cannot be any universal meaning; that would greatly limit a person. However, there can be meanings. There may be many small meanings. Writing a weblog entry, editing a video, composing a new piece of music, travelling to Görlitz. None of these components are self-sufficient; for instance, I cannot say that a trip to a particular city or video editing alone can be the meaning of my life. Of course not. It would be strange if the meaning of my life was a trip to a specifically designated city. However, not individually, but collectively, the meanings have meaning. One cannot construct a Big Meaning from them, but they make our lives a bit more bearable. So, I say that it is easy to answer the question "why", because the answer is simple: "for nothing". It is more important for a person to answer the question "how", because our lives are mainly built around this question, not around the question "why." Why? Because whatever we do, we mostly do it to make life more bearable. To reduce the amount of suffering. And that is all life! Hence, it would be strange to ask, "why." Why does a person not want to suffer? This question seems as complex as, for example, why the Universe exists. How is its existence even possible? Why is it there? I do not know. But there are many interesting things in it. And we do something with them. And we ask "what to do with them" and "how," not "why." Most of the time. Why do we not want to suffer? Suffering is hard. It is really hard. It is unpleasant. Every person finds their own way to cope with this hardship, and I too found consolation for myself in the last year. My life becomes much more bearable when I help someone. Help, making another person's life a bit more bearable too. It doesn't matter how exactly it happens: for instance, I relocated my family from Russia. They were terrorized there, my brother and mother lived in fear. Perhaps I do not fully realize the importance of what I did, and maybe I never will, but it made my life easier. My life became a little less unbearable when I helped my family. Or, say, a friend who found themselves in trouble and needed support. This happened more than once in my memory, and it was never easy. It was hard, just as it is hard to experience another person's pain yourself. But every time after such instances, my life became a little less unbearable. I felt involved and felt that, even though I found myself in this world involuntarily, I could help other people who also found themselves here not by their own choice. I always found it terribly unfair: a person does not have the option to veto their parents' decision when they are born into the world. They do not even choose their name at the beginning of their journey. I hold an unpopular point of view; I am an antinatalist. I consider the creation of new lives a great crime against humanity because by creating them, we inadvertently multiply suffering. It is the greatest act of violence a person is capable of. I would never conceive a child. If I had my way, I would only adopt someone to make their suffering less. But this also involves many challenging nuances, and for now, I need to sort myself out. It seems a paradox because making others' lives a bit more bearable is both the least and, at the same time, the greatest thing we can do. And you, like all people, bear the mark of the life we live. A mark that obliges suffering. I don't want you to suffer. And the only effective way not to entirely rid yourself of suffering but to make this life a little less unbearable is to make other people's lives less unbearable. To kill the anger towards the unjust and harsh, cruel structure of the world and accept the fact that we are all its unwilling captives, deprived of even a hint of finding the meaning of existence on this giant cold rock, lost somewhere in the backwater of the Universe. Accept this fact and help other sufferers who need help. All of us and each of us. Even if it seems that there is no strength left for it. Copyright (c) 2024 contact@renecoignard.com Powered by Weblog v1.17.16